Altyzo vs Peec AI: Analytics that report it vs agents that fix it

Peec AI earns a compliment first: it's honest about what it is. The Berlin-based platform describes itself plainly as "AI search analytics — not a content generator" — and within that lane it's excellent. Track prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity and others; see visibility, position, and sentiment; identify the citation sources engines actually use; segment by country, model, persona, or funnel stage; pipe it into Looker Studio, GA4, or your own stack via MCP and API. G2 rates it 4.9/5, and the pricing is transparent down to the enterprise tier.

It is also measurement-only by design. Peec tells you which sources engines cite and where you're absent — then your team does the rest. There's no content pipeline, no publishing, no optimization loop. The insight is the product.

Altyzo is built for the step after Peec stops. Seven agents take the diagnosis — the missing citations, the unclaimed prompts, the sources engines trust — and execute: research, content in each client's voice, publishing to the CMS, citation monitoring, and re-optimization. Peec tells you the water level; Altyzo's agents bail.

Where Altyzo wins

The work is the product

Peec's output is a list of things your team should do. Altyzo's output is the work done — articles written, structured for citation, reviewed by you, published to WordPress/Shopify/Webflow, then tracked. For teams whose bottleneck is production capacity rather than diagnosis, that difference is the entire decision.

Unlimited runs, no prompt arithmetic

Peec's plans cap you: 50 prompts on Starter, 277 on Growth. Agencies hit ceilings fast — 10 clients × 30 prompts each needs Enterprise math. Altyzo's flat license has no prompt caps, no credit columns, no tiered model access. Coverage decisions are made on what the work needs.

Agency economics that actually scale

Peec's agency tiers run $205–$675/mo on credits — reasonable for a few clients, compounding as you add them. Altyzo is $30K once for unlimited clients. An agency on Peec pays roughly $12K–$40K over five years and still has to execute everything themselves; the license buys the measurement and the labor.

Data stays on your infrastructure

Peec is SaaS — your prompt sets, competitor data, and client workspaces live on their servers. Altyzo runs as a Docker image on yours. For agencies with enterprise or regulated clients, self-hosting isn't just architecture — it's a line in the proposal.

Where Peec AI still has the edge

Genuinely the sharpest analytics UX

Peec's filtering by model, country, persona, and funnel stage — plus citation-source analysis at domain and URL level — is cleaner than almost anything in the category. If your question is purely "where do we stand and who do engines cite," it's the sharpest, most affordable read going.

Price of entry

$95/mo to start measuring is a tenth of our pitch's friction. For a marketing team that needs to prove AI search matters internally before any real budget exists, Peec is the right first dollar.

Integrations done properly

GSC, GA4, Looker Studio, MCP, API — Peec slots into an existing reporting stack without ceremony. Altyzo's data model is more self-contained by design.

Altyzo vs Peec AI: side by side

Choose based on what you actually need

Choose Altyzo if: You already believe AI visibility matters and your bottleneck is doing something about it — at client scale, without a meter, on infrastructure you own. Agencies and lean teams where production capacity is the constraint.

Choose Peec AI if: You need clean, affordable, honest analytics to establish the baseline and build the internal case — visibility, citations, sources, segments — and your team has the capacity to act on what it finds.

Common questions

Could I run Peec AI and Altyzo together?

You could — Peec's reporting polish is real — but there's overlap: Altyzo's Monitoring Agent tracks the same citations and gaps as part of the execution loop. Most teams end up choosing one measurement source; doubling up only makes sense if Peec's specific dashboards feed a report your clients already love.

Peec is $95/month. Why would anyone pay $30K?

Because $95/mo buys you a map of the problem — and someone still has to do the work. Altyzo's price includes the labor: the articles, the publishing, the tracking, the iteration. Compare Peec's subscription plus the writer/strategist hours to close the gaps it finds — that loaded comparison is the honest one, and it's where the license wins.

Is Peec's analytics better than Altyzo's monitoring?

For pure analytics UX — filtering, segmentation, source analysis — yes, it's a dedicated product and it shows. Altyzo's monitoring is built to feed the pipeline (find gap → fix gap → verify fix), not to be a standalone dashboard. If reporting polish is the job, Peec wins that lane.

Who shouldn't buy Altyzo?

Teams that don't yet know whether AI search drives anything for them. That's a legitimate state — and a $95 Peec subscription is the right way to answer it. Come back when the baseline is proven and the bottleneck is execution.